Municipality Code
ID Code for spmap
Municipality Group
Neighbouring municipality
Share of citizens with low trust in others (%)
Population age 25-64 unemployed for 6 months or more (%)
Level of education, high school, 3 yrs
Level of education, post-secondary, <3 yrs
Level of education, post-secondary, =>3 yrs
Level of education, post-graduate studies
Education, share of population with high education (%) (=>3 yrs post-secondary e
Foreign Background (% of Total Population)
Number of foreign born in municipality
Share of population born in another country (%)
Number of people with foreign citizenship in municipality
Share of population with foreign citizenship (%)
Median Income  (Female)
Median Income  (Male)
Median Income  (Total)
Municipal population mean income, 1000 sek, including all age 16+
Average life expectancy, men
Average life expectancy, women
Mean Age
Net Births
Net Migrants
Population, total
Population increase
Population increase (%)
Population 0-17 years (% of Total Population)
Population 18-64 years (% of Total Population)
Population 65+ years (% of Total Population)
Number of Emigrants
Female Population (% of Total Population)
Male Population (% of Total Population)
Share of high school graduates continued to college within 3 yrs after finished
No of students in municipal elementary school
No of students in free-standing elementary school
Share of total students in free-standing elementary school (%)
Total no of students in elementary school
Share of after-school centers privately run (%)
Childcare in total, share privately run (%)
Share of pre-schools privately run (%)
Share of pedagogic care privately run (%)
Grades school year 9, average merit rating
Grades high school graduates, average points
Share of students graduating high school within 3 yrs (%)
Number of children in high schools with private principals
Share of children in high schools with private prinicipals (%)
Total number of children in high schools
Share of children in pre-schools operated by another prinicpal than the municipa
Elderly care, no people age 65< granted home care, in total
Elderly care, no people age 65< granted home care in private companies
Elderly care, share of people age 65< in home care in private companies (%)
Share of students in SFI passed highest course (%)
Share of long-term unemployment, foreign born (excluding EU/EFTA) (%)
Share of population experiencing positive treatment when contacting municipality
Share of people getting response within two days when e-mailing municipality (%)
Share of people getting direct reply to an easy question when contacting municip
Citizen satisfaction index: culture, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: elderly care, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: emergency service, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: environmental work, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: elementary school, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: high school, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: pre-school, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: refuse collection, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: streets and roads, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: sports grounds, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: sidewalks and cycle paths, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: municipality treatment/availability, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: support for vulnerable people, scale 1-100
Citizen satisfaction index: water and drainage, scale 1-100
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes Centerpartiet (%)
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes Folkpartiet(%)
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes Kristdemokraterna(%)
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes Moderaterna(%)
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes Miljopartiet(%)
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes other parties(%)
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes Socialdemokraterna(%)
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes Sverigedemokraterna(%)
Election result municipal assembly, share of votes Vansterpartiet(%)
Number of seats in municipal assembly, Centerpartiet
Number of seats in municipal assembly, Folkpartiet
Number of seats in municipal assembly, Kristdemokraterna
Number of seats in municipal assembly, Moderaterna
Number of seats in municipal assembly, Miljopartiet
Number of seats in municipal assembly, other parties
Number of seats in municipal assembly, Socialdemokraterna
Number of seats in municipal assembly, Sverigedemokraterna
Number of seats in municipal assembly, Vansterpartiet
One Party has Ruled the Municipality Board for 40 years
The Party that has Ruled the Municipality Board for 40 years
Open assemblies in all committees, including municipal executive board, Yes=1 No
Open assemblies in all committees, excluding municipal executive board, Yes=1 No
Open assemblies in some committees, including municipal executive board, Yes=1 N
Open assemblies in some committees, exkluding municipal executive board, Yes=1 N
Share of Women in Municipality Council
Political secretaries hired in the municipality, mandateperiod 2010-2014, Yes=1
Political secreteries, number of full time positions
Political secreteries, total number
Municipality Board Ruled by Political Minority 2006
Ideology of ruling coalition
Number of approved citizen proposals during mandateperiod
Number of citizen propositions submitted during mandate period
Petition for referendum during the present mandate period, Yes=1 No=0
Referendums held in municipality, Yes=1 No=0
Voter turnout in election for municipal assembly
Frequency of citizen dialouge during mandate period, 4=<, 1=Yes 0=No
Frequency of citizen dialouge during mandate period, 1-3, 1=Yes 0=No
Does the municipality have citizen dialouges? 1=Yes 0=No
Possibility to participate in citizen dialouge through the municipal website? 1=
The municipality has a physical citizen office, Yes=1 No=0
The municipality has a webportal or callcenter as citizen office, Yes=1 No=0
User cooperatives within care for individuals with disabilities? Yes=1 No=0
User cooperatives within elderly care? Yes=1 No=0
User cooperatives within elementary school? Yes=1 No=0
User cooperatives within high school? Yes=1 No=0
User cooperatives within individual care? Yes=1 No=0
User cooperatives within (others)? Yes=1 No=0
User cooperatives within pre-school? Yes=1 No=0
User cooperatives within work integrated social companies? Yes=1 No=0
User co-production within care for people with disabilities?, Yes=1 No=0
User co-production within elderly care?, Yes=1 No=0
User co-production within elementary school?, Yes=1 No=0
User co-production within high school?, Yes=1 No=0
User co-production within individual care?, Yes=1 No=0
User co-production within pre-school?, Yes=1 No=0
User representation within disability care?, Yes=1 No=0
User representation within elderly care?, Yes=1 No=0
User representation within elementary school?, Yes=1 No=0
User representation within high school?, Yes=1 No=0
User representation within individual care?, Yes=1 No=0
User representation within other areas?, Yes=1 No=0
User representation within pre-school?, Yes=1 No=0
Cost for streets, roads and parking. SEK/citizen
Number of Companies
Economically Active Daytime Population
Sum assets in million SEK, municipal owned companies
Own capital in million SEK, municipal owned companies
Number of employees in municipal owned companies
Number of municipal owned companies
Result fo the year in million SEK, municipal owned companies
Revenue in million SEK, municipal owned companies
Outsourcing, business
Outsourcing, elderly and disability care
Outsourcing, education
Outsourcing, individual and family care
Outsourcing, infrastructure
Outsourcing, pre-schools and school care
Outsourcing neighbouring municipalities, mean value
Outsourcing neighbouring municipalities, highest value
Municipal contribution per child, private after-school center
Municipal contribution per child, private pedagogic care
Municipal contribution per child, private pre-school
Municipal contribution per student, free standing elementary school
Municipal contribution per student, elementary school in another municipality
Municipal contribution per student, high school in county
Municipal contribution per student, in free-standing high school
Municipal contribution per student, high school in another municipality
Total cost per child, after-school center
Total cost per child, pedagogic care
Total cost per child, pre-school
Total cost per child, elementary school
Total cost per child, high school
Public-private partnership in the municipality, Yes=1 No=0
No of private providers in assistance to people with disabilities
No of private providers in elderly care
No of private providers in nursery class, elementary school
No of private providers in health care
No of private providers in high schools
No of private providers in individual and family care (IFO)
No of private providers, other education
No of private providers in pre-school, after-school center
No of private providers in refugee reception
Purchase of municipal main activities, care & welfare
Purchase of municipal main activities, pedagogic care
Purchase of municipal main activities, refugee reception
Municipal purchase from privately owned companies in 1000 sek
Taxation, SEK/resident
Tax revenue, 1000 SEK
Municipal year-end result
Freedom of choice within care for disabled, Yes=1 No=0
Freedom of choice within elementary school, Yes=1 No=0
Freedom of choice within geriatric care, Yes=1 No=0
Freedom of choice within high school, Yes=1 No=0
Freedom of choice within individual care, Yes=1 No=0
Freedom of choice within preschool, Yes=1 No=0
The chairmen of auditors is appointed by the majority, Yes=1 No=0
The chairmen of auditors is appointed by the minority, Yes=1 No=0
Number of auditors in municipality
Municipal employed with post-secondary education (%)
Share of municipal newly employed during the year (%)
Share of municipal employed resigned during the year (%)
Sick leave municipal employed (%)
Average salary within the municipal sector
No of municipal employees within administration
No of municipal employees within care and welfare
No of municipal employees whitin culture, tourism and leisure
No of municipal employees within rehab and prevention
No of municipal employees within school and child care
No of municipal employees within social and curative work
No of municipal employees within technology
Total no of municipal employees
Number of local newspapers
Acceptable Action: Civil Servant asking for money
Acceptable Action: Offering Gift/Service during procurement process
Acceptable Action: Extra Tuition to Relative's Child (Public School)
Acceptable Action: Offer a Job to Unqualified Relative or Friend
Acceptable Action: Extra Tuition to Relative's Child (Private School)
Audit: Pointing at deficiencies
Audit: Remarks leads to action
Audit: Effective measures
Participation of bureacrats in the political decision process, early on in the p
Participation of bureacrats in the political decision process, when investigatio
Participation of bureacrats in the political decision process, when formulating
Participation of bureacrats in the political decision process, when draft decisi
Participation of bureacrats in the political decision process, when decisions ar
Current Mandate Period: Politician Influencing Public Administraton Report
Current Mandate Period: Former Politician Hired
Current Mandate Period: Not Hiring the Most Qualified Person
Current Mandate Period: Gift/Service Offered During Procurement Process
Current Mandate Period: Public Employee paid to Perform Duties
Consequences for municipalities cooperating with private service contractors, mu
Consequences for municipalities cooperating with private service contractors, ec
Consequences for municipalities cooperating with private service contractors, ci
Importance of dialouge with citizens, early on in the process when initiatives a
Importance of dialouge with citizens, when investigations are carried out prior
Importance of dialouge with citizens, when formulating draft decisions(0-10)
Importance of dialouge with citizens, when draft decisions are discussed prior t
Importance of dialouge with citizens, when decisions are made(0-10)
Importance of dialouge with citizens, when management implements decisions(0-10)
Importance of dialouge with citizens, when decisions are evaluated(0-10)
Impartiality: Housing
Impartiality: Building Permit
Impartiality: Environmental Permit
Impartiality: Procurements
Impartiality: Recruitment
Political Influence: Building Permits
Political Influence: Recruitment of Public Employee
Political Influence: Housing Intermediary
Political Influence: Environmental Permits
Political Influence: Procurement
Extent of consulting when shaping political propositions, politicians from your
Extent of consulting when shaping political propositions, politicians from other
Extent of consulting when shaping political propositions, political bureaucrats(
Extent of consulting when shaping political propositions, nonpolitical bureaucra
Extent of consulting when shaping political propositions, entrepreneurs in your
Extent of consulting when shaping political propositions, citizens(1-5)
Extent of consulting when shaping political propositions, close friends and fami
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, municipal council(0-10)
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, you yourself (politician
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, municipal executive board
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, chairman of municipal exe
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, other municipal politicia
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, bureaucrats(0-10)
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, citizens(0-10)
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, public authorities(0-10)
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, the local industry and co
Level of influence in municipal political acitivities, journalists monitoring th
Main occupation apart form politician, bureaucrat (1=Yes 0=No)
Main occupation apart from politician, bureaucrat with supervisory position(1=Ye
Main occupation apart from politician, bureaucrat with business managing positio
Bribe Index
Partiality Index
Recruitment Index
Performance management models, balance score card applied? (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, balance score card, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, balance score card, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=No
Performance management models, balance score card, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, balance score card, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, balance sheet units applied? (1=Yes 0=No
Performance management models, balance sheet units, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, balance sheet units, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=N
Performance management models, balance sheet units, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, balance sheet units, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, client choice applied? (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, client choice, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, client choice, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, client choice, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, client choice, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, corporatisation applied? (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, corporatisation, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, corporatisation, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, corporatisation, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, corporatisation, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, fee-for-service applied? (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, fee-for-service, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, fee-for-service, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, fee-for-service, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, fee-for-service, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, management by objectives applied? (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, management by objectives, experimented (1=Yes 0=N
Performance management models, management by objectives, fully implemented (1=Ye
Performance management models, management by objectives, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, management by objectives, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, profit centres applied? (1=Yes 0=No
Performance management models, profit centres, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, profit centres, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, profit centres, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, profit centres, phased out((1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, process management applied? (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, process management, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, process management, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=No
Performance management models, process management, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, process management, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, privatisation applied? (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, privatisation, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, privatisation, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, privatisation, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, privatisation, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, purchaser provider split applied? (1=Yes 0=No
Performance management models, purchaser provider split, experimented (1=Yes 0=N
Performance management models, purchaser provider split, fully implemented (1=Ye
Performance management models, purchaser provider split, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, purchaser provider split, phased out(1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, quality management applied? (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, quality management, experimented (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, quality management, fully implemented (1=Yes 0=No
Performance management models, quality management, evaluated (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, quality management, phased out (1=Yes 0=No)
Performance management models, relative performance evaluations applied? (1=Yes
Performance management models, relative performance evaluations, experimented (1
Performance management models, relative performance evaluations, fully implement
Performance management models, relative performance evaluations, evaluated (1=Ye
Performance management models, relative performance evaluations, phased out (1=Y
Number of respondents
Common with corruption, school & child care
Common with corruption, social services
Common with corruption, technical administration
Common with corruption, planning & buildning
Common with corruption, culture & leisure
Common with corruption, business sector & tourism
Common with corruption, health care
Exposed to violence or threats, yourself
Exposed to violence or threats, politicians/bureaucrats
Statement, politicians misuse power
Statement, bureaucrats misuse power
Statement, politicians misuse power, other municipalities
Statement, bureaucrats misuse power, other municipalities
Statement, public procurement impartiality, in general
Statement, public procurement impartiality, own municipality
Statement, importance of auditing
Statement, importance of local media
Statement, easy to receive benefits
Statement, intervene when appropriating
Statement, easy to trust people
Knowledge of corruption regulation, yourself
Knowledge of corruption regulation, bureaucrats
Knowledge of corruption, politicians
Education needed to enhance knowledge of corruption
Degree of information on corruption
Importance of local regulation to prevent corruption
Sufficiency, guidelines for bribes
Sufficiency, guidelines for bias
Sufficiency, guidelines for representation
Sufficiency, guidelines for procurement
Prevention of corruption, vivid issue
Offered money or other favours, yourself
Offered money or other favours, politicians/bureaucrats
Accepted money or other favours, politicians/bureaucrats
Offered money or other favours, politicians/bureaucrats other municipalities
Accepted money or other favours, politicians/bureaucrats other municipalities